Temperaments are sets of pitches in which
some or all of the intervals are being reinterpreted as approximations
of various just intervals.
In equal division temperaments, some
interval, usually an octave, is divided into a number of equal parts, each with
the same frequency ratio, usually irrational. In such systems each interval
consists of n parts and is tuned the same in all transpositions.
Intervals are standardised rather than varied, giving the impression that their
irrational proportions are in some sense “correct”. For intervals close to
ratios, like the fifth in 12ED2, this property seems beneficial. It allows that
particular tuning system to convincingly simulate the purity of melodic
Pythagorean tuning while eliminating the problems of the Pythagorean comma. It
does so, however, at the expense of the fundamental sound of beatless
Pythagorean chords like 2:9:16, 6:8:9, 8:9:12, etc.
For other, less well represented ratios,
12ED2 simply replicates the same poorly tuned simulation in 12 transpositions.
In this case, offering a variety of different approximations would offer
a clear advantage. By allowing our ears to actually hear various
shadings of intonation, their capacity to perceive contextually implied
just intervals is stimulated. This, in turn, allows the available intervals to
be more readily composed harmonically rather than atonally. Such
an approach is common when writing for symphony orchestra, which combines many
instruments of flexible tuning. In this context every interval is varied on a
sliding scale navigated by chance and skill, determining the refinement and
particular sonority of the ensemble. Only with the advent of MIDI guide tracks
in the 1980s were orchestras forced to consistently reproduce 12ED2, blurring
the resultant inharmonicity with continuous vibrato.
In well tempered tuning systems,
transpositions of a given interval, though often differing from each
other in terms of tuning, may still be perceived by the ear as the intended
sounds, based on context. The historical motivation for this family of tunings
with unequal steps was a desire to maintain the benefits of meantone
temperament (pure thirds) in some keys while eliminating the very dissonant
wolf fifth between G# and Eb. This was made possible by observing the
similarity in size between the Pythagorean comma (531441/524288 or ca.
23.5 cents) – produced by traversing a series of 12 perfect fifths transposed
within an octave – and the Syntonic comma (81/80 or ca. 21.5 cents) –
the difference between four perfect fifths and a major third tuned as 5/4.
In the 17th and 18th centuries, various well
temperaments were proposed (by Kirnberger, Werkmeister, Vallotti, Rameau, et
al.) and to the present day there are advocates of specific solutions for
particular repertoire (Lindley, Lehman, et al.). Revealing, however, is Johann
Sebastian Bach’s decision to not specify anyparticular well
temperament for his 48 preludes and fugues. This is perhaps the case because of
Bach’s own experience, playing instruments in numerous coexisting tuning
systems at various absolute pitch-heights. Whatever preferences he may have had
when tuning his own harpsichord, Bach’s music demonstrates that context
may convince the ear of harmonic relationships in spite of the specific choices
of temperament. This point of view eventually led to the adoption and
standardisation (in the 19th and 20th centuries) of 12ED2 at a standard
Kammerton of 440 Hz. Ironically, the reduction of interval variety by a factor
of 12 was soon followed by a move to new tone systems and atonality in new
music. Over the course of the 20th century jazz harmony and the work of
Scriabin and Messiaen, among others, sketched out the remaining unexplored harmonic
possibilities of the 12-tone set.
As we move further into the 21st century,
tonal applications of 12ED2 in contemporary classical, jazz, and popular music
styles, though ubiquitous, seem more and more like tired clichés. Some composers
have turned away from pitch to noise, conceptualism, or theatre, while others
are pursuing microtonality and extended just intonation as a way to explore new
harmonic sounds. At first glance, it seems if a single standardised alternative
were to take the place of 12ED2 it would need to be a finer resolution equal
temperament, such as 31ED2, 41ED2, 53ED2, or 72ED2, to name four of the best
candidates for harmonic sound-combinations. Since none of these offer a complete
approximation of tuneable sounds, however, none can be considered a complete
tone system. At the same time, increasing the number of microtonal divisions
greatly increases the ergonomic challenges of building and playing fixed-pitch
instruments. For these reasons – too few intervals, too many notes – general
adoption of a new form of equal temperament is an unlikely development.
The only really convincing choice as a
general tone system for new harmonic music, then, is extended just intonation
based on tuneable intervals. These, for the most part, are intervals derived
from the first 19 harmonics of the series, including their multiples and
combinations, and occasionally extending to include higher primes. Such a basis
combines material shared by tonal music practices, old and new, from around the
world – Chinese, Indian, Persian, Arabic, Greek, African, European,
American,… – and at the same time opens fresh, as yet unexplored, horizons of
sound and composition. This is possibly the most promising option for
developing a more “universal” theoretical and practical basis for music.
Musicians would need to be able to reproduce or approximate just intervals within an aurally acceptable tolerance range depending on the musical context. Fortunately, many of these sounds are what singers and musicians already hear as being “good” or “expressive” intonation – it simply requires extension and refinement of existing tonal skills along with an openness for new sonorities. Instruments need to be flexible enough to play some of these pitches, more of them, to combine with each other based on a common logic of extended JI to produce well-tuned harmonic sounds. In many cases (strings, brass, voice) this is already possible. For woodwinds, fixed-pitch keyboards and fretted instruments, more flexibility and diversity, not reductive standardisations, are needed. Different scordature, different Kammertons from period and regional practices, different frettings and temperaments already offer many possibilities to be explored and superimposed.
For instruments with a limited number of fixed pitches, the question becomes: which JI pitches might it make sense to tune, especially if the instrument, like a piano, cannot be adjusted before each piece in a concert. This opens the possibility of revisiting the old idea of well temperaments, and to consider how they might be made for the most part out of just pitches. This would combine compatibility with new JI music and old 12-note music. Thinking about this question led me to formulate two well-tempered systems for two keyboard instruments a quartertone apart, which may be realised on pianos or other suitable instruments. Mallet percussion might be adapted, for example, by correcting the length of resonators, perhaps using telescopic tubing systems.
Sabat I was
conceived in 2015 as a kind of “inverse Vallotti” well temperament, with six
perfect fifths, and six fifths narrowed by ca. 1/6 comma. The seven white notes
are tuned in Pythagorean diatonic, as a chain of 3/2 perfect fifths. The
remaining pitches are tuned according to the 19th and 17th harmonics, creating
slightly narrowed “fifths”. G-Bb and F#-A are tuned as 19/16. C-Db and D#-E are
tuned as 17/16. The remaining pitch, G#/Ab, is tuned to make a compromise
between 17/16 and 18/17.
8 : 9 can be divided thus: 16 : 17 : 18 = 272 : 289 : 306 (G : Ab : A) so the difference between 17 : 18 and 16 : 17 is 288 : 289 (G# : Ab)
split this difference harmonically it is divided thus:
576 : 577 : 578 (G# : G#/Ab : Ab)
is tuned as 577 (a prime) by dividing G
: A as (32*17 =) 544 : 577 : 612 (= 36*17)
Sabat II was conceived after working for a while with the earlier tuning and wishing for a variation, one which took advantage of the schisma (the difference between eight 3/2 fifths and a 5/4 major third) to produce 5-limit major thirds, like the very earliest Pythagorean keyboard tunings, and which, consequently, was easier to tune by ear. This led to a more extreme well temperament with somewhat spicier narrow “fifths” (ca. 1/3 comma narrower than just). In spite of these radical “fifths”, this tuning sounds surprisingly convincing in performances of classical and new music.  The series of perfect 3/2 fifths is extended to include F#, and 5/4 major thirds F#-A# and Db-F are tuned. G-Ab and D#-E form 17/16 ratios, dividing the whole tones G : A and D : E in almost equal steps, harmonically and subharmonically.
For each of these two well temperaments, a
complementary quartertone tuning has been conceived for a second piano, by
employing the narrow fifth created by two stacked 11/9 intervals to move
between undertonal and overtonal 11th harmonic sounds relating to the
Pythagorean notes C G D A E. The continuity of fifths is made possible by
combining 3, 5, 7, 11 and 13. In Sabat II, the major thirds of the main
keyboard are extended to include natural 13th harmonics above and below the Db
and A# respectively.
It is hoped that these new well temperaments
offer viable alternatives to equal temperament that are suitable for
performances of the old repertoire and at the same time for the creation of new
music composed in microtonally extended just intonation.
 The first public performance of Sabat II was presented in Berlin by Thomas Nicholson at KM28, on 15 February 2019, in a program of music by Sabat, Beethoven, Nicholson, and Feldman.